Trump lashes out at wrong court after his effort to defund sanctuary cities is struck down

Esther Yu-Hsi Lee

Esther Yu-Hsi Lee Immigration Reporter, Think Progress

The morning after a federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s attempts to deny federal funding to so-called “sanctuary cities,” President Trump threatened to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

“First the Ninth Circuit rules against the ban & now it hits again on sanctuary cities-both ridiculous rulings,” Trump wrote as the first of a three-part Twitter rant Wednesday morning. “See you in the Supreme Court!”

Trump said that the Ninth Circuit — where he presumed the ruling was issued — has a “terrible record of being overturned.” But Judge William Orrick — a district court judge based in San Francisco who issued Tuesday’s injunction — does not sit on the Ninth Circuit, which is an appeals court. As Politico pointed out, the Ninth Circuit will be the next court that will hear the case if the Trump administration chooses to appeal the decision.

Orrick’s ruling on Tuesday blocked key parts of Trump’s executive order which would pull federal funding from so-called “sanctuary cities,” or localities where local law enforcement can choose to limit cooperation with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency by not turning over suspected undocumented immigrants. As it stands, police department manuals in some current sanctuary localities still suggest officers establish whether people are in the country without authorization, which could encourage immigration enforcement.

In his ruling, Orrick argued that taking federal funding away from cities and counties like Santa Clara County and the city of San Francisco, which challenged the law by not cooperating with federal authorities, could be unconstitutional. He pointed out that these localities would face “immediate irreparable harm” in part because federal grants that “support core services in their jurisdictions” could be cut off.

Late Tuesday night, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer released a statement attacking the decision as an “egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge.” Spicer also decried the city of San Francisco as a place that ignores federal immigration law and puts the “well-being of criminal aliens before the safety” of U.S. citizens.

“San Francisco, and cities like it, are putting the well-being of criminal aliens before the safety of our citizens, and those city officials who authored these policies have the blood of dead Americans on their hands,” Spicer said in his statement. “This San Francisco judge’s erroneous ruling is a gift to the criminal gang and cartel element in our country, empowering the worst kind of human trafficking and sex trafficking, and putting thousands of innocent lives at risk.”

U.S. Department of Justice spokesperson Ian Prior said in a statement that Orrick’s ruling didn’t prevent the federal government from enforcing rules to some grants in localities that do not cooperate with federal immigration officials.

“Further, the order does not purport to enjoin the Department’s independent legal authority to enforce the requirements of federal law applicable to communities that violate federal immigration law or federal grant conditions,” Prior said.

White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus promised the administration would appeal.

“Again it’s the Ninth Circuit going bananas,” Priebus, who also mistook Orrick for a Ninth Circuit judge, said Tuesday. “It’s clear forum-shopping that’s going on. …We will win at the Supreme Court level.”

Trump previously slammed the Ninth Circuit when it upheld a lower court’s temporary injunction blocking his executive order to prevent immigrants from some Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States.

***

Reposted from Think Progress.

Esther Yu-Hsi Lee is an Immigration Reporter/Blogger for ThinkProgress. She received her B.A. in Psychology and Middle East Studies and a M.A. in Psychology from New York University. A Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) beneficiary, Esther is passionate about immigration issues from all sides of the debate. She is originally from Los Angeles, CA.

Posted In: Allied Approaches

Union Matters

A Few Hundred Million Good Reasons Not to Care

Sam Pizzigati

Sam Pizzigati Editor, Too Much online magazine

Millions of American families are still reeling from the aftershocks of the financial crash a dozen years ago. But a key architect of that debacle, Countrywide Financial CEO Angelo Mozilo, is feeling no pain — and no remorse either. In the decade before the crash, Mozilo took $650 million out of Countrywide, a hefty chunk of that just before the subprime mortgage scam Countrywide exploited started to implode. Earlier this month, Angelo described Countrywide as a “great company” at a conference appearance and declared subprimes as “not the cause at all” of the nation’s 2007-2008 financial wreckage. Added Mozilo: “Somehow — for some unknown reason — I got blamed.” The former CEO is acknowledging that all the blame did at one point bother him. And now? The famously always tanned Mozilo notes simply: “I don’t care.” 

***

More ...

Every Worker's Right

Every Worker's Right