AFL-CIO to Push for Revised NAFTA to Protect Workers’ Rights, Raise Incomes

Mark Gruenberg

Mark Gruenberg Editor, Press Associates Union News

Vowing to hold Republican President-elect Donald Trump to his promise to repeal the controversial 23-year-old jobs-losing North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the AFL-CIO and a group of pro-labor lawmakers will push for a new NAFTA that protects workers’ rights and raises their incomes, too – on all sides of all U.S. borders.

Their opening salvo came in a press conference on the first day of the GOP-run 115th Congress. Whether their plan will get anywhere is open to question: As some lawmakers noted, several key players in Trump’s proposed Cabinet are confirmed free traders. And the lawmakers who spoke were all House Democrats, who are heavily outnumbered there.

That didn’t stop them. “Renegotiating NAFTA is a necessary first step towards creating an economy with shared prosperity” for workers, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said.

Trump used his denunciations of NAFTA and similar job-losing trade agreements to narrowly win the key Great Lakes industrial states of Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, giving him an Electoral College majority over Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

Trump’s arguments resonated with factory workers who have lost their jobs – with no or inadequate replacements, the lawmakers said – to NAFTA and succeeding trade pacts. Unions and workers opposed the pacts, predicting the calamities which have since occurred. Calculations show NAFTA alone cost between 685,000 and 1 million factory jobs in 23 years.

But, emphasizing that they’re for fair trade that helps workers, the lawmakers and Trumka want to trash the current NAFTA and replace it with one that puts workers first. And Trumka reminded listeners that Trump promised on the campaign trail to make such pro-worker deals. He vowed the fed and the solons will hold him to it.

“The momentum for a new” type of trade pact “is very, very clear and growing,” Trumka pointed out. “We saw it in the grass-roots campaign that killed the TPP (the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade pact), in the primaries of both parties and in the general election.

“When Donald Trump was elected, I made it clear the labor movement would work with Trump, where possible, on positions consistent with our values,” he said. Trade is one.

“Working Americans have to be at the center of any new strategy” for trade deals, both a replacement NAFTA and anything else, added Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., who led the successful fight in Congress to kill the TPP.

Rep. Paul Tomko, D-N.Y., said it’s time to “deliver policies that speak to American workers.”  And Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., said the junking-bad-trade-deals stand should extend to other past pacts, including letting China into the World Trade Organization. Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, invited Trump to come there, or to “any state that has lost jobs to NAFTA, and talk to the workers” about its devastation of factories, families and communities.

Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., added another harm from NAFTA and similar pacts: Firms used them to force U.S. workers to accept lower wages and lousy benefits, by threatening to move. That’s what Mondelez, owner of Nabisco, did with its Oreo cookies production line on Chicago’s South Side last year, she said. That’s what it’s doing now at a cookie plant in the Philadelphia area, added Rep. David Norcross, D-N.J., a former building trades leader whose South Jersey congressional district is right across the Delaware River.

And Trump could act as soon as he becomes president, Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., added, by sending a required negation notice under the pact to Canada and Mexico. Trump “also has the authority to impose additional tariffs on” a big trade violator, China, he added.

The “new NAFTA” labor and the lawmakers envision would include:

            • Enforceable worker rights and environmental standards written into the texts of trade pacts, not as “side letters,” and accompanied by tough and predictable enforcement.

            • Elimination of the Investor State Dispute System (ISDS), the secret pro-business “trade court” staffed by trade lawyers, that can kill federal, state and local laws – everything from job safety to Buy American statutes – that firms claim threaten present or future profits.

• Making currency manipulation a trade violation, subject to penalties and tariffs. DeLauro said several months after NAFTA passed, Mexico devalued the peso, further inciting U.S. firms to move plants to Mexico. Maquiladoras – U.S. factories transplanted over the border – have grown by 86 percent in 23 years, she said.

            • Writing protection for Buy American language into a new NAFTA and any other trade pacts. Federal, state and local “government dollars” should be spent on “procurement or products” made by American workers, Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, said.

            • Upgrading “rules of origin” for cars and parts. Trade pacts let so many car parts be made overseas, said Rep. Debbie Dingell, D-Mich., that “40 percent of a vehicle can be made in China or Japan and it still could say ‘made in North America.’”

The new NAFTA should benefit workers on all sides of both the U.S.-Mexico and U.S.-Canada borders, Kaptur declared. Holding up a 22-year-old Houston Chronicle she had saved, Kaptur noted it was the only paper to send reporters to Mexico to find out what would happen there after NAFTA. The paper forecast high Mexican unemployment and migration to the U.S.

Several lawmakers were unsure of where Trump stands. He nominated ardent “free traders” to top posts, except for his nominee for U.S. Trade Representative, former Reagan administration trade official Robert Lighthizer.

Teamsters President Jim Hoffa, who was not at the press conference, said that nod shows Trump “laid the groundwork for following through on his campaign promise to end U.S. trade policies that devastated working families for the past 30 years.” The Teamsters hope “Lighthizer will enact policies that help our working families by strengthening U.S. industry and bringing back good-paying jobs to our country.”  

Posted In: Allied Approaches

Union Matters

An Invitation to Sunny Miami. What Could Be Bad?

Sam Pizzigati

Sam Pizzigati Editor, Too Much online magazine

If a billionaire “invites” you somewhere, you’d better go. Or be prepared to suffer the consequences. This past May, hedge fund kingpin Carl Icahn announced in a letter to his New York-based staff of about 50 that he would be moving his business operations to Florida. But the 83-year-old Icahn assured his staffers they had no reason to worry: “My employees have always been very important to the company, so I’d like to invite you all to join me in Miami.” Those who go south, his letter added, would get a $50,000 relocation benefit “once you have established your permanent residence in Florida.” Those who stay put, the letter continued, can file for state unemployment benefits, a $450 weekly maximum that “you can receive for a total of 26 weeks.” What about severance from Icahn Enterprises? The New York Post reported last week that the two dozen employees who have chosen not to uproot their families and follow Icahn to Florida “will be let go without any severance” when the billionaire shutters his New York offices this coming March. Bloomberg currently puts Carl Icahn’s net worth at $20.5 billion.

***

More ...

Health Care Should Not Be A Bargaining Weapon

Health Care Should Not Be A Bargaining Weapon