Progressives Oppose Supreme Court Pick, Citing Anti-Worker and -Women History

Mark Gruenberg

Mark Gruenberg Editor, Press Associates Union News

Blasting his consistent record against workers’ rights to unionize and women’s rights to reproductive choice, progressive groups immediately swung into action against right-wing GOP President Donald Trump’s nomination of federal appellate judge Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court..

But not all the groups promised to mobilize now. Instead, some appealed for money for the fight, without saying how they would use it to derail and defeat him. And AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said members would remember in November which senators voted for Kavanaugh.

The activists were different. The Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC), for example, immediately launched television ads highlighting Kavanaugh’s stands in the states of two up-for-grabs GOP senators, Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski and Maine’s Susan Collins. It urged Alaskan and Maine residents to lobby the two to vote against Kavanaugh.

NARAL Pro-Choice America started an ad campaign, too, President Ilyse Hogue said. Their ads rain in those two states, plus Colorado, Nevada and Texas.

Trump nominated Kavanaugh, a judge for the past 12 years on the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for D.C., to take the seat Justice Anthony Kennedy, the court’s current “swing vote,” who is leaving on July 31. Unlike Kennedy, Kavanaugh has a consistent record of pro-right-wing, anti-worker and anti-woman rulings on that bench.

He’s also said a president should not be subject to criminal indictments – or even to questioning – while in office. That leaves only impeachment as a remedy.

“Judge Kavanaugh has a dangerous track record of protecting the privileges of the wealthy and powerful at the expense of working people,” said Trumka. “Any Supreme Court nominee must be fair, independent and committed to protecting the rights, freedoms and legal safeguards of all Americans. Kavanaugh does not meet this standard and must not be confirmed.”

“Kavanaugh routinely rules against working families, regularly rejects employees’ right to receive employer-provided health care (and) too often sides with employers in denying employees relief from discrimination in the workplace.”

“The current Supreme Court has shown it will side with greedy corporations over working people whenever given the chance, and this nominee will only skew that further,” Trumka warned.

“Working people expect the Supreme Court to be the fairest and most independent branch of government in America. Any senator who believes Supreme Court justices should protect the rights of all Americans should reject this nomination and demand a nominee who will protect the rights of working people and uphold our constitutional values of liberty, equality and justice for all.”

Citing three cases where Kavanaugh specifically sided with bosses against Communications Workers members, the union also opposed naming him to the court.

“Based on his record, we can expect Kavanaugh will continue to protect the interests of already powerful corporate CEOs instead of working families,” CWA added

Other groups were specific in their denunciations. Those appealing for money added they expect the right wing to launch a multimillion dollar ad campaign for Kavanaugh. For Trump’s prior nominee, Neil Gorsuch, the right spent at least $17 million, the Alliance for Justice reported.

And Gorsuch was not a “swing vote” on the High Court, while Kavanaugh would replace the swing vote, Kennedy.

“Trump’s nominee Kavanaugh is an extreme choice for the Supreme Court,” one rotating PCCC ad says. The rotating summaries of “Kavanaugh’s key opinions” include “Employers should be able to eviscerate union rights” and “Presidents – including Trump -= are above the law and should never be indicted.” Another rotating summary in the ad calls the judge “Stealthy on abortion.”

And Politico reported PCCC and other groups, including Indivisible, NARAL Pro-Choice America, People for the American Way and MoveOn.org are already planning “a massive mobilization next week” against Kavanaugh. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kent., wants a vote on Kavanaugh before the November election.

“Right-wing extremists could make their mark on our justice system for generations if Trump gets his way,” PCCC spokeswoman Marissa Barrow said.  “Kavanaugh is handpicked by far-right ideologues and corporate interests. He has a controversial record that would deeply damage our democratic principles and civil liberties.” He also “routinely sided with corporations over working families.”

“This is one of the biggest fights of our lifetime. Write your senators and urge them to reject the nomination of Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.”

“Kavanaugh was hand-picked for Trump by fringe groups because he would be a reliable vote on the Supreme Court to undermine Roe v Wade” – the decision legalizing reproductive rights – “and destroy access to health care for millions,” said Nan Aron, Alliance for Justice executive director. 

Voting against Roe v Wade was Trump’s “litmus test” for a High Court judge, though at his Kavanaugh press conference Trump claimed he did not ask nominees their personal views, but only whether they were “originalists.” “Originalism” is a code-word for right-wing views.

“Kavanaugh’s record shows us how serious the threat to the court really is. He has established a record that shows his lack of commitment to consumers’ rights, workers’ rights, clean air and water, and the fundamental principle that no president is above the law,” Aron said. “That’s unacceptable for someone who wants to sit on our highest court.” 

Kavanaugh “wrote a scathing dissent of a decision allowing an undocumented young woman, Jane Doe, access to abortion care, allowed an anti-choice organization to bring its argument that employers should be able to control employees’ reproductive health and bodies into the case against the Affordable Care Act, and under George W. Bush, oversaw the nomination of the most extreme anti-choice judicial nominees ever seen,” NARAL’s Hogue said.  Including lower-court judges, “Only Donald Trump has surpassed Bush in appointing extremist nominees.”                          

 

Posted In: Allied Approaches

Union Matters

Home Health Care Workers Under Attack

By Bethany Swanson
USW Intern

Home health care workers have important but difficult jobs that require them to work long hours and chaotic schedules to care for the country’s rapidly growing elder population.

Instead of protecting these workers, the vast majority of whom are women and people of color, the current administration plans to make it harder for them to belong to unions, stifling their best chance for improving working conditions and wages.

The anti-union measure would roll back an Obama-era rule that allows home care workers, whose services are paid for through Medicaid, to choose to have their union dues deducted directly from their paychecks.

The goal of the rule, like the recent Janus decision and other anti-union campaigns, is to starve unions out of existence, so they can no longer protect their members.

Home health care workers bathe, dress, feed and monitor the health of the sick and elderly, but they often cannot afford to provide for their own families.

On average, they make little more than $10 an hour and more than half rely on some sort of public assistance. Most receive few or no benefits, even though home care workers and other direct care workers have some of the highest injury rates of any occupation.

That’s why many home care workers have turned to labor unions.

More ...

The Dirty Truth about Janus

The Dirty Truth about Janus