Federal Workers Take to Streets to Protest Trump Union Busting

Mark Gruenberg

Mark Gruenberg Editor, Press Associates Union News

Clad in T-shirts declaring “#RedforFeds,” thousands of federal workers and their allies – union and non-union – took to the streets nationwide on July 25 to vociferously protest anti-worker GOP President Donald Trump’s federal-union-busting executive orders.

The protests, organized by the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), the largest federal union, were in conjunction with a federal district court hearing on unions’ lawsuits seeking to declare Trump’s edicts illegal under labor law and unconstitutional under the Bill of Rights.

The 65 rallies nationwide led to four videos from AFGE and a twitter campaign. They were a day after AFGE learned the Federal Labor Relations Authority – the agency which oversees labor-management relations between the government and its two million workers – is ready to rule against another Trumpite, Education Secretary Elizabeth “Betsy” DeVos.

AFGE filed a formal 5-count labor law-breaking – formally called unfair labor practices – charge against DeVos for unilaterally imposing of a new “contract” on her 3,900 AFGE-represented workers. FLRA’s hearing officer ruled for the union and against her.

Trump’s three executive orders, issued just before Memorial Day, took effect July 1. Their impact is already showing up in agencies in terms of cowed workers and disrupted services to everyone in the U.S., AFGE and other unions say. That’s because the orders poison the environment for the feds, making them less able to do their jobs, the union adds.

Trump’s orders “chip away at due process and collective bargaining rights for federal employees and impede employee representation at the job site,” AFGE explained.

Trump ordered agency chiefs to bargain new, restrictive contracts with workers, impose rules to make it easy to fire a worker within a month and to force federal union shop stewards and bargainers to work on their own time and on their own time, rather than being paid for lost time during work.

“The executive orders are a direct assault on our apolitical civil service system and are nothing but thinly veiled attempts at busting unions and rolling back workplace rights across the country,” AFGE said.

The AFL-CIO Executive Council, meeting in D.C., issued a strong statement against Trump’s orders, promising to “work to have them declared illegal or rolled back by Congress.” Trump’s orders “would politicize the career civil service, opening it up to corruption and cronyism,” the fed said. “They do nothing to improve operations of government agencies.”

“By depriving workers of their rights to address and resolve workplace issues, they would do the opposite. Issues like sexual harassment, racial discrimination, retaliation against whistleblowers, workplace health and safety… and so much more would be more difficult to resolve. The EOs will lead to more mismanagement, create inefficiencies and hinder the ability of dedicated employees to deliver services to the public in an efficient and effective manner. They represent an outrageous attack against our work, our citizens and our democracy.”

“The EOs dismantle federal employees’ basic workplace rights, their ability to protect each other from unfair treatment and their fundamental ability to bargain collectively,” said Treasury Employees President Tony Reardon. His union and AFGE started the lawsuits against Trump. Trump’s anti-worker “executive orders make a mockery of” collective bargaining, he added. “Weakening the voice and rights of federal employees only strengthens the special interests who want federal agencies to serve them and their specific agendas rather than the general public,” Reardon stated.

"We will stand in solidarity with you every day it takes until things are set right,” Washington State Labor Council President Jeff Johnson told a large noontime rally outside the federal building in Seattle, The Stand, the WSLC’s on-line paper, reported.

“President Trump may still be living in a world where he is a game-show host, but we live in a world where getting the right services to the right people on time often is the difference between life and death, eating or starving, and dignity or disrespect,” Johnson said.

The nation’s largest union, the National Education Association, also backed the #RedforFeds day and the lawsuits. NEA includes 6,000 teachers at Defense Department schools. “The harmful and ill-conceived executive orders…are an affront to the women and men serving in our military safe-guarding our country as well as to the thousands of public servants – teachers, bus drivers, cafeteria workers – working hard every day to educate their families” in those schools said NEA President Lily Eskelsen-Garcia.

And Randy Erwin, president of the National Federation of Federal Employees/ Machinists, called Trump’s executive orders “a direct attack on our constitutional 1st Amendment rights: The right to freedom of association, and the right to form and join a union.”

Meanwhile, AFGE gleefully said Trump Education Secretary DeVos, a GOP big giver known for her hatred of public schools and teachers’ unions, lost when she tried to impose her own anti-worker “contract” on her department’s workers. Its formal complaint said DeVos wouldn’t even agree to ground rules for negotiating a new contract at her department, much less a contract itself. Instead, DeVos unilaterally presented a pact “that stripped out most of the parties’ previous collective bargaining agreement and essentially removes all union rights.”

AFGE members at the Education Department overwhelmingly rejected DeVos’ deal, but she went ahead – illegally – and imposed it anyway. The hearing officer said that action broke federal government labor law, which says an agency may do so only if the two sides bargain to an impasse. DeVos’ loss “puts all agencies on notice that they cannot use President Trump’s illegal and unconstitutional executive orders as a cover to bust unions and gut employees’ rights,” AFGE President J. David Cox added.                

test

Posted In: Allied Approaches

Union Matters

America’s Wealthy: Ever Eager to Pay Their Taxes!

Sam Pizzigati

Sam Pizzigati Editor, Too Much online magazine

Why do many of the wealthiest people in America oppose a “wealth tax,” an annual levy on grand fortune? Could their distaste reflect a simple reluctance to pay their fair tax share? Oh no, JPMorganChase CEO Jamie Dimon recently told the Business Roundtable: “I know a lot of wealthy people who would be happy to pay more in taxes; they just think it’ll be wasted and be given to interest groups and stuff like that.” Could Dimon have in mind the interest group he knows best, Wall Street? In the 2008 financial crisis, federal bailouts kept the banking industry from imploding. JPMorgan alone, notes the ProPublica Bailout Tracker, collected $25 billion worth of federal largesse, an act of generosity that’s helped Dimon lock down a $1.5-billion personal fortune. Under the Elizabeth Warren wealth tax plan, Dimon would pay an annual 3 percent tax on that much net worth. Fortunes between $1 billion and $2.5 billion would face a 5 percent annual tax under the Bernie Sanders plan.

***

More ...

No Such Thing as Good Greed

No Such Thing as Good Greed